Welcome to the Malloy & Malloy, P.L.
Intellectual Property law Blog
Our goal is to provide some general information about recent developments and interesting news impacting Patent, Trademark and Copyright Issues. Please feel free to check back often for the latest.
Section 101 as applied to a Computer-Implemented System and Method
07-09-2008 [Ben Hanrahan] [Permalink]In Ex Parte Wasynczuk, No. 2008-1496, a patent applicant appealed a 35 U.S.C. 101 final rejection on two sets of claims, namely, claims directed to “a computer-implemented system” and a “computer-implemented method.” In general, the invention relates to computer programs that simulate physical systems.
In particular, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) found that although the computer-implemented method simply solves “purely mathematical representations of physical systems,” and that “the claimed simulating does not receive information from real world physical systems nor does it output data that controls a real world physical system,” it nevertheless qualifies as a Section 101 “process.” Specifically because the method claim “recites that the first simulating step is performed on a ‘first physical computing device’ and the second simulating step is performed on ‘a second physical computing device’” the claim recites a “particular apparatus,” and thus “the method operates on another class of statutory subject matter such that the method is a patentable ‘process.’”
The entire BPAI decision can be found here.


