The Sixth Circuit, in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, had previous held that Congress intentionally eliminated the de minimis exception to claims alleging infringement of a sound recording. The VMG Court, however, did not find that reasoning persuasive and, in fact, stated that the Sixth Circuit erred. This is not the first time that the Bridgeport decision has been questioned. Many District Courts have simply declined to apply the rule. Additionally, the notable copyright treatise penned by Nimmer "devotes many pages to explaining why the Sixth Circuit's opinion is, in no uncertain terms, wrong."
Ninth Circuit Breaks from Sixth; Recognizes De Minimis Exception to Song Sampling Copyright InfringementWritten by W. John Eagan
Recognizing that it was taking an unusual step, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit deliberatley broke from Sixth Circuit precedent in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. Madonna Louise Ciccone when it determined that the 0.23 second sample of horns which was copied from an earlier song titled "Love Break" was de minimis, and therefore, did not constitute copyright infringement.
Mr. Eagan earned his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University and his law degree, with honors from the University of Miami. While at the University of Miami he served as the Inter-American Citator and an Articles and Comments Editor for the Inter-American Law Review. Mr. Eagan is admitted to practice law in the State of Florida and concentrates his practice in Intellectual Property litigation.
Latest from W. John Eagan
- Supreme Court Rules "Secret" Sale of Invention Can Trigger On-Sale Bar Under America Invents Act
- Singapore Trademark Office Denies Cartier's Claim to "LOVE"
- Intellectual Property Provisions of the USMCA, after NAFTA
- USPTO Issues Patent No. 10,000,000
- Public Domain Day 2019 to Mark End of Copyright "Freeze"